Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP13710
Authors: Alma Cohen; Moshe Hazan; David Weiss; Roberto Tallarita
Abstract: CEOs of public companies have influence over the political spending of their firms, which has been attracting significant attention since the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United. Furthermore, the policy views expressed by CEOs receive substantial consideration from policymakers and the public. The political preferences of CEOs, we argue, are therefore important for a full understanding of U.S. policymaking and politics. To contribute to this understanding, we provide empirical evidence on the partisan leanings of public-company CEOs.We use Federal Election Commission (FEC) records to put together a comprehensive database of the political contributions made by over 3,500 individuals who served as CEOs of S&P 1500 companies during the period 2000-2017. We find that these political contributions display substantial partisan preferences in support of Republican candidates. We identify how this pattern is related to the company’s industry, geographical region, and CEO gender. To highlight the significance of CEO’s partisan preferences, we show that public companies led by Republican CEOs tend to be less transparent to investors with respect to their political spending. We conclude by discussing the policy implications of our analysis.
Keywords: political spending; political contributions; republicans; democrats; CEOs; corporate political influence
JEL Codes: G3; G34; G38; K2; K22
Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.
Cause | Effect |
---|---|
CEO political preferences (M12) | corporate transparency regarding political spending (G38) |
Republican CEOs (M12) | corporate transparency regarding political spending (G38) |
CEO political preferences (M12) | asset value of companies (G32) |
CEO gender (M12) | CEO political preferences (M12) |
industry (L89) | CEO political preferences (M12) |
geographical region (R10) | CEO political preferences (M12) |