The Economics and Politics of Revoking NAFTA

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP13393

Authors: Andrei A. Levchenko; Raphael Auer; Barthelemy Bonadio

Abstract: Abstract We provide a quantitative assessment of both the aggregate and the distributional effects of revoking NAFTA, using a multi-country, multi-sector, multi-factor model of world production and trade with global input-output linkages. Revoking NAFTA would reduce US welfare by about 0.2%, and Canadian and Mexican welfare by about 2%. The distributional impacts of revoking NAFTA across workers in different sectors are an order of magnitude larger in all three countries, ranging from -2.7 to 2.26% in the United States. We combine the quantitative results with information on the geographic distribution of sectoral employment, and compute average real wage changes in each US congressional district, Mexican state, and Canadian province. We then examine the political correlates of the economic effects. Congressional district-level real wage changes are negatively correlated with the Trump vote share in 2016: districts that voted more for Trump would on average experience greater real wage reductions if NAFTA is revoked.

Keywords: NAFTA; quantitative trade models; distributional effects; protectionism; trade policy

JEL Codes: F11; F13; F16; F62; J62; R13


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
Revoking NAFTA (F15)U.S. welfare (I38)
Revoking NAFTA (F15)Canadian welfare (I38)
Revoking NAFTA (F15)Mexican welfare (I38)
Revoking NAFTA (F15)U.S. sectoral wage changes (J31)
Trump vote share (D79)real wage changes in congressional districts (J39)
High import exposure (F10)negative wage changes (E31)
High export orientation (F10)negative wage changes (E31)
Imported input intensity (Y10)negative wage changes (E31)

Back to index