Can Active Labor Market Policy Be Counterproductive?

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP10270

Authors: Gilles Saint-Paul

Abstract: We study active labor market policies (ALMP) in a matching model. ALMPs are modelled as a subsidy to job search. Workers differ in their productivity, and search takes place along an extensive margin. An additional job seeker affects the quality of unemployed workers. As a result, the Hosios conditions are no longer valid. To replicate the optimum the worker share in bargaining must exceed the Hosios level, and one must impose a tax on job search activity. The coalition in favor of ALMP is also studied.

Keywords: Active Labor Market Policies; Hosios Condition; Job Matching

JEL Codes: E24; E32; J41; J63; J64


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
ALMP (J68)average quality of job seekers (J24)
average quality of job seekers (J24)job finding rate (J68)
ALMP (J68)job finding rate (J68)
worker share in bargaining (J52)optimal outcome (L21)
imposed tax on job search activity (J68)counterbalance increased bargaining power of workers (J52)
ALMP benefits less productive job seekers (J68)negatively impacts more productive workers (J29)
ALMP (J68)coalition favoring these policies among least productive groups (D72)
ALMP (J68)aggregate welfare (E10)

Back to index