Weapons of Choice

Working Paper: CEPR ID: DP10082

Authors: Axel Dreher; Merle Kreibaum

Abstract: We investigate the effect of natural resources on whether ethno-political groups choose to pursue their goals with peaceful as compared to violent means, distinguishing terrorism from insurgencies. We hypothesize that organizations are more likely to resort to terrorism rather than rebellion in richer countries where population mobilization is more difficult. We use data from the Minorities at Risk Organizational Behavior (MAROB) project, covering 118 organizations in 13 countries of the Middle East and North Africa over the 1980-2004 period. Our multinomial logit models combine group- and country-specific information and show that ethno-political groups are more likely to resort to rebellion rather than using peaceful means or becoming terrorists when representing regions rich in oil. Groups that participate in exerting power over their region are less likely to turn to large-scale violence.

Keywords: oil; rebellion; resource curse; terrorism

JEL Codes: F51; Q34


Causal Claims Network Graph

Edges that are evidenced by causal inference methods are in orange, and the rest are in light blue.


Causal Claims

CauseEffect
oil resources extracted from territory (L71)likelihood of engaging in insurgencies (D74)
GDP per capita (O49)likelihood of engaging in insurgencies (D74)
resource abundance (Q33)choice between peaceful means and terrorism (D74)

Back to index